In a new Washington Times article on Maryland’s minority-contracting program, UMBC political science and public policy professor George La Noue argues that definitional and structural program flaws translate to too few businesses “graduating” from the program (i.e., losing eligibility through successful growth to a certain size). La Noue argues that the definition of what qualifies a business as “disadvantaged” for program eligibility is too broad. He suggests, “To argue that someone is economically disadvantaged who has that kind of money is a very tortured definition of that concept; it would mean that 95 percent of all Americans are disadvantaged. The …
This is archived content. It is being kept only for reference, research, or record-keeping purposes and is no longer updated.
If this page is inaccessible to you, please complete this form to request it be made accessible. Please do not use this form to report issues related to the content of this page or for general queries. For all other questions or problems, please seek assistance at my.umbc.edu/help .